2004 Maserati Spyder vs. 1981 Mazda Cosmo

To start off, 2004 Maserati Spyder is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 4,254 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Maserati Spyder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Maserati Spyder (385 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 265 more horse power than 1981 Mazda Cosmo. (120 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Maserati Spyder should accelerate faster than 1981 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Maserati Spyder weights approximately 580 kg more than 1981 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Maserati Spyder (447 Nm) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mazda Cosmo. (162 Nm). This means 2004 Maserati Spyder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mazda Cosmo.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Maserati Spyder 1981 Mazda Cosmo
Make Maserati Mazda
Model Spyder Cosmo
Year Released 2004 1981
Body Type Convertible Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4254 cc 2292 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 2 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 385 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 7000 RPM 7000 RPM
Torque 447 Nm 162 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1730 kg 1150 kg
Vehicle Length 4310 mm 4670 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2620 mm