2004 Maserati Spyder vs. 1986 Rover 825
To start off, 2004 Maserati Spyder is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Rover 825. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Rover 825 would be higher. At 4,254 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Maserati Spyder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Maserati Spyder (385 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 267 more horse power than 1986 Rover 825. (118 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Maserati Spyder should accelerate faster than 1986 Rover 825. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Maserati Spyder weights approximately 254 kg more than 1986 Rover 825. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Maserati Spyder is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Maserati Spyder. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Rover 825, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Maserati Spyder (447 Nm) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Rover 825. (268 Nm). This means 2004 Maserati Spyder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Rover 825.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Maserati Spyder | 1986 Rover 825 | |
| Make | Maserati | Rover |
| Model | Spyder | 825 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4254 cc | 2499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 385 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 447 Nm | 268 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.1:1 | 22.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 1476 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.8 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 21.4 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 18.1 L/100km | 5.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 68 L |
