2004 Maserati Spyder vs. 2010 Ford F-150
To start off, 2010 Ford F-150 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Maserati Spyder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Maserati Spyder would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Maserati Spyder (385 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2010 Ford F-150. (292 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Maserati Spyder should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford F-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford F-150 weights approximately 622 kg more than 2004 Maserati Spyder.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Maserati Spyder (447 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford F-150. (433 Nm). This means 2004 Maserati Spyder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford F-150.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Maserati Spyder | 2010 Ford F-150 | |
| Make | Maserati | Ford |
| Model | Spyder | F-150 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4254 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 385 HP | 292 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 447 Nm | 433 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 2352 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 5885 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2004 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1887 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3670 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.8 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 21.4 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 98 L |
