2004 Mazda 2 vs. 1956 Talbot Sport
To start off, 2004 Mazda 2 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Talbot Sport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Talbot Sport would be higher. At 2,490 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Talbot Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Talbot Sport (118 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 2. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Talbot Sport should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 2 weights approximately 788 kg more than 1956 Talbot Sport.
Because 1956 Talbot Sport is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Talbot Sport. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 2 | 1956 Talbot Sport | |
Make | Mazda | Talbot |
Model | 2 | Sport |
Year Released | 2004 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2510 mm |