2004 Mazda 2 vs. 1962 Toyota Crown
To start off, 2004 Mazda 2 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 1,897 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 2 (99 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1962 Toyota Crown. (80 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1962 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Toyota Crown weights approximately 100 kg more than 2004 Mazda 2.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 2 (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Toyota Crown. (145 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda 2 | 1962 Toyota Crown | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | 2 | Crown |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1560 cc | 1897 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 80 HP |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 22.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 1255 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 75 L |
