2004 Mazda 2 vs. 1964 Morgan 4
To start off, 2004 Mazda 2 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 2 (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1964 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1964 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 2 weights approximately 495 kg more than 1964 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 2 | 1964 Morgan 4 | |
Make | Mazda | Morgan |
Model | 2 | 4 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1560 cc | 1340 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 55 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2450 mm |