2004 Mazda 2 vs. 1964 Singer Vogue III
To start off, 2004 Mazda 2 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Singer Vogue III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Singer Vogue III would be higher. At 1,592 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Singer Vogue III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Singer Vogue III (79 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 2. (74 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Singer Vogue III should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 2 weights approximately 33 kg more than 1964 Singer Vogue III.
Because 1964 Singer Vogue III is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Singer Vogue III. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 2 | 1964 Singer Vogue III | |
Make | Mazda | Singer |
Model | 2 | Vogue III |
Year Released | 2004 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1242 cc | 1592 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 81.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 76.2 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1092 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 47 L |