2004 Mazda 2 vs. 1992 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2004 Mazda 2 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 2. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 2.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mazda 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1992 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 2004 Mazda 2 has manual transmission. 2004 Mazda 2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda 2 | 1992 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | 2 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2298 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1760 mm |
