2004 Mazda 2 vs. 1993 Pontiac Firebird
To start off, 2004 Mazda 2 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Pontiac Firebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Pontiac Firebird would be higher. At 3,353 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Pontiac Firebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Pontiac Firebird (160 HP) has 61 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 2. (99 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Pontiac Firebird should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 2 weights approximately 378 kg more than 1993 Pontiac Firebird.
Because 1993 Pontiac Firebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Pontiac Firebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 2 | 1993 Pontiac Firebird | |
Make | Mazda | Pontiac |
Model | 2 | Firebird |
Year Released | 2004 | 1993 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 3353 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 160 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 59 L |