2004 Mazda 2 vs. 1996 Rover 400

To start off, 2004 Mazda 2 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 400 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 400 (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 2. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 400 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 2 weights approximately 668 kg more than 1996 Rover 400.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Rover 400 (182 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 2. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1996 Rover 400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 2.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Mazda 2 1996 Rover 400
Make Mazda Rover
Model 2 400
Year Released 2004 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1596 cc 1396 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 99 HP 102 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 146 Nm 182 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 79 mm 75 mm
Engine Stroke Size 81.4 mm 79 mm
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1788 kg 1120 kg
Vehicle Length 3930 mm 4320 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1550 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2500 mm 2630 mm