2004 Mazda 2 vs. 2000 Mini MK VII
To start off, 2004 Mazda 2 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mini MK VII. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mini MK VII would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mini MK VII is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mini MK VII (96 HP @ 6130 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 2. (74 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mini MK VII should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 2 weights approximately 390 kg more than 2000 Mini MK VII.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 2 (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mini MK VII. (115 Nm @ 2650 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mini MK VII.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 2 | 2000 Mini MK VII | |
Make | Mazda | Mini |
Model | 2 | MK VII |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1242 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6130 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2650 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 735 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2040 mm |