2004 Mazda 2 vs. 2008 Mazda Rustler
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 2 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 2 weights approximately 774 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 2 (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (120 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 2 | 2008 Mazda Rustler | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | 2 | Rustler |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1586 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 146 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Top Speed | 181 km/hour | 165 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.4 seconds | 11.6 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 1014 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.1 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 54 L |