2004 Mazda 2 vs. 2010 Daihatsu Copen
To start off, 2010 Daihatsu Copen is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 2 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 2 (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2010 Daihatsu Copen. (86 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 2010 Daihatsu Copen. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 2 weights approximately 938 kg more than 2010 Daihatsu Copen. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 2 (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Daihatsu Copen. (120 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Daihatsu Copen.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 2 | 2010 Daihatsu Copen | |
Make | Mazda | Daihatsu |
Model | 2 | Copen |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 79.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 181 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.4 seconds | 9.8 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.1 L/100km | 6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 40 L |