2004 Mazda 2 vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 2 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Clio (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 2. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 2 weights approximately 573 kg more than 2010 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Clio (151 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 2. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 2. 2010 Renault Clio has automatic transmission and 2004 Mazda 2 has manual transmission. 2004 Mazda 2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Renault Clio will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 2 | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 2 | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 151 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Top Speed | 181 km/hour | 186 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.4 seconds | 12.2 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 1215 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.1 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 55 L |