2004 Mazda 2 vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 2 would be higher. At 1,460 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Clio (81 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 2. (74 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Clio weights approximately 50 kg more than 2004 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 2 (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Clio. (200 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 2 | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 2 | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1242 cc | 1460 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 17.9:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 15.1 seconds | 12.7 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.3 L/100km | 4.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 55 L |