2004 Mazda 2 vs. 2010 Tata Indica
To start off, 2010 Tata Indica is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 2 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 2 (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2010 Tata Indica. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 2010 Tata Indica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 2 (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Tata Indica. (120 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Tata Indica.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 2 | 2010 Tata Indica | |
Make | Mazda | Tata |
Model | 2 | Indica |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1405 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Top Speed | 181 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 3680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 37 L |