2004 Mazda 2 vs. 2011 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2011 Kia Cadenza is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 2 would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Kia Cadenza (294 HP) has 227 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 2. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 2 weights approximately 210 kg more than 2011 Kia Cadenza.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Kia Cadenza has automatic transmission and 2004 Mazda 2 has manual transmission. 2004 Mazda 2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Kia Cadenza will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 2 | 2011 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Mazda | Kia |
Model | 2 | Cadenza |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1399 cc | 3300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 294 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2845 mm |