2004 Mazda 2 vs. 2012 Ford Kuga
To start off, 2012 Ford Kuga is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 2 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Ford Kuga is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Kuga (197 HP) has 98 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 2. (99 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Kuga should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 2.
Because 2012 Ford Kuga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mazda 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Kuga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 2 | 2012 Ford Kuga | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 2 | Kuga |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 197 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 53 L |