2004 Mazda 3 vs. 1951 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Talbot Baby (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Talbot Baby should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Talbot Baby weights approximately 410 kg more than 2004 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda 3 | 1951 Talbot Baby | |
| Make | Mazda | Talbot |
| Model | 3 | Baby |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1951 |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 2690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3130 mm |
