2004 Mazda 3 vs. 1952 Saab 92
To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Saab 92 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 3 (99 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1952 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1952 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 3 weights approximately 281 kg more than 1952 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 3 | 1952 Saab 92 | |
Make | Mazda | Saab |
Model | 3 | 92 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2480 mm |