2004 Mazda 3 vs. 1960 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 3 (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 3 (203 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda 3 | 1960 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | 3 | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2540 mm |
