2004 Mazda 3 vs. 1960 Simca Plein Ceil
To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Simca Plein Ceil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Simca Plein Ceil would be higher. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 3 (149 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1960 Simca Plein Ceil. (56 HP @ 200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1960 Simca Plein Ceil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 3 weights approximately 685 kg more than 1960 Simca Plein Ceil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Simca Plein Ceil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Simca Plein Ceil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda 3 | 1960 Simca Plein Ceil | |
| Make | Mazda | Simca |
| Model | 3 | Plein Ceil |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1960 |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 149 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2360 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 42 L |
