2004 Mazda 3 vs. 1962 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 3 (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 3 weights approximately 382 kg more than 1962 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 3 | 1962 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 3 | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1189 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1282 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2290 mm |