2004 Mazda 3 vs. 1962 Renault 8
To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 3 weights approximately 495 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda 3 | 1962 Renault 8 | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | 3 | 8 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2280 mm |
