2004 Mazda 3 vs. 1962 Volkswagen Beetle
To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volkswagen Beetle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volkswagen Beetle would be higher. At 1,349 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 3 (83 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1962 Volkswagen Beetle. (24 HP @ 3300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Volkswagen Beetle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 3 weights approximately 395 kg more than 1962 Volkswagen Beetle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 3 | 1962 Volkswagen Beetle | |
Make | Mazda | Volkswagen |
Model | 3 | Beetle |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1349 cc | 1129 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 40 L |