2004 Mazda 3 vs. 1963 Renault 4
To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 3 (149 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1963 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 3 weights approximately 1135 kg more than 1963 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 3 | 1963 Renault 4 | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 3 | 4 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 747 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 38 L |