2004 Mazda 3 vs. 1965 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,349 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 3 (83 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 3 weights approximately 255 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda 3 | 1965 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | 3 | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1349 cc | 1189 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2290 mm |
