2004 Mazda 3 vs. 1979 Skoda L
To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Skoda L would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1979 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1979 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 3 weights approximately 415 kg more than 1979 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 3 (230 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 3 | 1979 Skoda L | |
Make | Mazda | Skoda |
Model | 3 | L |
Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1046 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 74 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.3:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 38 L |