2004 Mazda 3 vs. 1980 Skoda L
To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Skoda L would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 3 (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1980 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1980 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 3 weights approximately 457 kg more than 1980 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 3 (203 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Skoda L. (74 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 3 | 1980 Skoda L | |
Make | Mazda | Skoda |
Model | 3 | L |
Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1046 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 74 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 8.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1282 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 38 L |