2004 Mazda 3 vs. 1980 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 3 (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 3 weights approximately 427 kg more than 1980 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda 3 | 1980 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Mazda | Zastava |
| Model | 3 | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1282 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2010 mm |
