2004 Mazda 3 vs. 1990 Porsche Mega Cabriolet Biturbo
To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Porsche Mega Cabriolet Biturbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Porsche Mega Cabriolet Biturbo would be higher.
Because 1990 Porsche Mega Cabriolet Biturbo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Porsche Mega Cabriolet Biturbo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Porsche Mega Cabriolet Biturbo (732 Nm) has 502 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 3. (230 Nm). This means 1990 Porsche Mega Cabriolet Biturbo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 3 | 1990 Porsche Mega Cabriolet Biturbo | |
Make | Mazda | Porsche |
Model | 3 | Mega Cabriolet Biturbo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 230 Nm | 732 Nm |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 325 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 77 L |