2004 Mazda 3 vs. 2002 Westfield ZEI
To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Westfield ZEI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Westfield ZEI would be higher. At 1,349 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Westfield ZEI (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 3. (83 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Westfield ZEI should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 3 weights approximately 483 kg more than 2002 Westfield ZEI.
Because 2002 Westfield ZEI is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Westfield ZEI. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 3 | 2002 Westfield ZEI | |
Make | Mazda | Westfield |
Model | 3 | ZEI |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 1349 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 672 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2340 mm |