2004 Mazda 3 vs. 2003 Holden Rodeo
To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Holden Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Holden Rodeo would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden Rodeo (145 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 3. (144 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 3.
Because 2003 Holden Rodeo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Holden Rodeo (280 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 3. (184 Nm). This means 2003 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 3 | 2003 Holden Rodeo | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | 3 | Rodeo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 144 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 280 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3060 mm |