2004 Mazda 3 vs. 2005 Peugeot 206
To start off, 2005 Peugeot 206 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 1,997 cc, 2005 Peugeot 206 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Peugeot 206 (175 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 3. (83 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Peugeot 206 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 3 weights approximately 55 kg more than 2005 Peugeot 206.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 3 (230 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Peugeot 206. (205 Nm @ 4750 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Peugeot 206.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 3 | 2005 Peugeot 206 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | 3 | 206 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1349 cc | 1997 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 205 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 14.6 seconds | 7.4 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.1 L/100km | 8.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 50 L |