2004 Mazda 3 vs. 2006 Opel Antara
To start off, 2006 Opel Antara is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Opel Antara (212 HP @ 1400 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 3. (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Opel Antara should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 3.
Because 2006 Opel Antara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Opel Antara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Opel Antara (542 Nm) has 339 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 3. (203 Nm). This means 2006 Opel Antara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda 3 | 2006 Opel Antara | |
| Make | Mazda | Opel |
| Model | 3 | Antara |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1899 cc |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 212 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 542 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1760 mm |
