2004 Mazda 3 vs. 2008 Mazda 5
To start off, 2008 Mazda 5 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 3 would be higher. Both 2004 Mazda 3 and 2008 Mazda 5 are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 3 (144 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 5. (141 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 5 weights approximately 387 kg more than 2004 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 5 (360 Nm) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 3. (184 Nm). This means 2008 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 3 | 2008 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | 3 | 5 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 144 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 360 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 86 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1223 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.8 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 60 L |