2004 Mazda 3 vs. 2009 Citroen Xsara

To start off, 2009 Citroen Xsara is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 3 (144 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2009 Citroen Xsara. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen Xsara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 117 kg more than 2004 Mazda 3.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen Xsara (250 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 3. (184 Nm). This means 2009 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Mazda 3 2009 Citroen Xsara
Make Mazda Citroen
Model 3 Xsara
Year Released 2004 2009
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 1997 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 144 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 184 Nm 250 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1223 kg 1340 kg
Vehicle Length 4540 mm 4380 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2550 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 7.8 L/100km 5.3 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 54 L