2004 Mazda 3 vs. 2010 Peugeot 407
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 407 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Peugeot 407 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 407 (208 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 3. (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 407 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 3 weights approximately 78 kg more than 2010 Peugeot 407.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 407 (290 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 3. (203 Nm). This means 2010 Peugeot 407 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 3 | 2010 Peugeot 407 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | 3 | 407 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 290 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.9:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1282 kg | 1204 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.4 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 67 L |