2004 Mazda 3 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva

To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 2,384 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (165 HP) has 61 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 3. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 638 kg more than 2004 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 230 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Mazda 3 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
Make Mazda Chevrolet
Model 3 Captiva
Year Released 2004 2012
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1595 cc 2384 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 104 HP 165 HP
Torque 230 Nm 230 Nm
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1240 kg 1878 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 4673 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1849 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1756 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2707 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 65 L