2004 Mazda 3 vs. 2012 Citroen C3
To start off, 2012 Citroen C3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 3 (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2012 Citroen C3. (70 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2012 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 3 weights approximately 260 kg more than 2012 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 3 (203 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Citroen C3. (147 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 3 | 2012 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Mazda | Citroen |
Model | 3 | C3 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 147 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 18.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1282 kg | 1022 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.4 L/100km | 4.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 45 L |