2004 Mazda 3 vs. 2013 Lamborghini Aventador
To start off, 2013 Lamborghini Aventador is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 3 would be higher.
Because 2013 Lamborghini Aventador is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Lamborghini Aventador will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lamborghini Aventador (690 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 450 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 3. (240 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2013 Lamborghini Aventador will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 3 | 2013 Lamborghini Aventador | |
Make | Mazda | Lamborghini |
Model | 3 | Aventador |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 8250 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 690 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 90 L |