2004 Mazda 3 vs. 2013 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2013 Nissan Cube is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 3 (144 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2013 Nissan Cube. (120 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2013 Nissan Cube. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Cube weights approximately 71 kg more than 2004 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 3 (184 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Nissan Cube. (172 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Nissan Cube.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda 3 | 2013 Nissan Cube | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | 3 | Cube |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 144 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 172 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 81 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1223 kg | 1294 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1695 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2530 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 6.7 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 8.4 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 50 L |
