2004 Mazda 6 vs. 1942 Packard 12
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Packard 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Packard 12 would be higher. At 7,301 cc (12 cylinders), 1942 Packard 12 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Packard 12 weights approximately 974 kg more than 2004 Mazda 6.
Because 1942 Packard 12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Packard 12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda 6 | 1942 Packard 12 | |
| Make | Mazda | Packard |
| Model | 6 | 12 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1942 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 7301 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 2450 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 5800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3440 mm |
