2004 Mazda 6 vs. 1949 Talbot Saoutchik
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Talbot Saoutchik. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Talbot Saoutchik would be higher. At 4,480 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Talbot Saoutchik is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (220 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1949 Talbot Saoutchik. (168 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1949 Talbot Saoutchik. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Talbot Saoutchik weights approximately 287 kg more than 2004 Mazda 6.
Because 1949 Talbot Saoutchik is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Talbot Saoutchik. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mazda 6 | 1949 Talbot Saoutchik | |
| Make | Mazda | Talbot |
| Model | 6 | Saoutchik |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1949 |
| Engine Size | 2964 cc | 4480 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1513 kg | 1800 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3160 mm |
