2004 Mazda 6 vs. 1954 Riley RM A
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 230 kg more than 1954 Riley RM A.
Because 1954 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 6 | 1954 Riley RM A | |
Make | Mazda | Riley |
Model | 6 | RM A |
Year Released | 2004 | 1954 |
Engine Size | 2184 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 164 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2870 mm |