2004 Mazda 6 vs. 1963 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 6,376 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (295 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 6. (144 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 6.
Because 1963 Pontiac Tempest is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Pontiac Tempest. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 6 | 1963 Pontiac Tempest | |
Make | Mazda | Pontiac |
Model | 6 | Tempest |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 6376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 144 HP | 295 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2930 mm |