2004 Mazda 6 vs. 1963 Seat 600

To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1963 Seat 600. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 770 kg more than 1963 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (231 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Seat 600. (47 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Seat 600.

Compare all specifications: