2004 Mazda 6 vs. 1968 Volvo P 1800
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo P 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo P 1800 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Volvo P 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Volvo P 1800 (103 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 6. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Volvo P 1800 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 255 kg more than 1968 Volvo P 1800.
Because 1968 Volvo P 1800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Volvo P 1800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (231 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Volvo P 1800. (152 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Volvo P 1800.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mazda 6 | 1968 Volvo P 1800 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 6 | P 1800 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 231 Nm | 152 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1090 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2460 mm |