2004 Mazda 6 vs. 1970 Zastava 1300

To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 2,964 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (220 HP) has 167 more horse power than 1970 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1970 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 533 kg more than 1970 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1970 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (260 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Zastava 1300.

Compare all specifications: