2004 Mazda 6 vs. 1971 Zastava 1300

To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (256 HP) has 203 more horse power than 1971 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1971 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 50 kg more than 1971 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Mazda 6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1971 Zastava 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (380 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Zastava 1300.

Compare all specifications: